<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
    <author>ENA</author>
    <category>Sectors</category>
    <date>2026-02-26 16:21:25</date>
    <fulldesc>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Delhi, Feb 26 (KNN)&lt;/strong&gt; The Supreme Court has reiterated that while considering a plea under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Adjudicating Authority must only examine whether a financial debt exists and whether there has been a default. It cannot refuse admission based on the corporate debtors ability or inability to pay.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi dismissed an appeal by Power Trust, promoter of Hiranmaye Energy Ltd., holding that the IBC marks a clear departure from the winding-up regime under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Under the Code, the inquiry at admission is limited to debt and default.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Background&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The case concerned loans exceeding Rs 2,300 crore advanced by REC Ltd. to Hiranmaye Energy Ltd. for a thermal power project in Haldia, West Bengal. Restructuring proposals in 2020, subject to conditions, were never implemented. REC filed a Section 7 plea citing March 31, 2018 as the date of default. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The NCLT admitted the application, and the NCLAT upheld it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Courts Findings&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The promoter argued that restructuring shifted the default into the Covid-protected period under Section 10A and claimed the company was commercially viable. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The Court rejected this, holding the default dated back to March 31, 2018 and was not covered by Section 10A.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Distinguishing Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd. v. Axis Bank Ltd., the Bench noted there was no binding award in favour of the corporate debtor exceeding the creditors claim. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;With outstanding dues above Rs 3,100 crore&amp;mdash;far exceeding revenue and EBITDA&amp;mdash;the Court held commercial viability is irrelevant at the admission stage.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Finding the requirements of Section 7 satisfied, the Court dismissed the appeal and vacated the stay on insolvency proceedings.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;MSME Implications&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;The ruling narrows the scope for MSMEs to resist admission into CIRP once debt and default are established. Claims of operational viability or future prospects will not prevent insolvency initiation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;While the decision strengthens creditor rights and expedites the process, it also increases the risk of faster insolvency admission for MSMEs that may be viable but facing temporary financial stress.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
&#13;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;(KNN Bureau)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#13;
</fulldesc>
    <id>45292</id>
    <link>https://knnindia.co.in/news/newsdetails/sectors/ability-or-inability-to-pay-not-relevant-for-cirp-admission-supreme-court</link>
    <pubDate>2026-02-26 16:21:25</pubDate>
    <source>knnindia.co.in</source>
    <title>Ability Or Inability To Pay Not Relevant For CIRP Admission: Supreme Court</title>
</root>
